Saturday, November 25, 2017

I wonder why we make art?

I don't want to paint so I'm going to babble on about art for awhile... a few photos maybe!

Do we wake up one morning with a compelling urge to be creative and make art....perhaps. Stranger things happen.  I'd rather think it starts young with an interest over anything else how we spend our free time. I say free time because most of our time is controlled during our basic educational years. 

Making art, making things, I suppose is like being a mechanic, writer, cook or a doctor... it starts much the same way, exposure and a little outside influence at the right times. Absolutely a normal behavior and if allowed to follow its course with opportunity, perhaps develop into a career....

As kids we built things like dirt forts. Some scrap wood and old wagon wheels could be a makeshift downhill racer. Mixing up wall paint could lead to unfortunate hot pink clubhouse walls..... We got into everything as kids to entertain ourselves. We ran in packs, played war games or baseball and we ignored the girls....until we didn't. Girls liked school.... boys typically did not unless it was about making things, sports, cars or girls.

This is the time when special interests take hold and likely shape our future....at least it did for me and others I know.   

Obviously mine were anything related to architecture/design and art. Why? Largely because my grandmother suggested "architect" when I didn't understand the question "what do you want to do when you grow up! Not in school yet! "Architect" had no meaning! I'm sure she (Gee) gave me  my first understanding. Growing up nothing was out of bounds as long as it was in that section of the library. No other section had my attention, period!  Could say it was a narrow minded focus because I would rebel against anything that interfered with that single, simple word "Architect". Laughing... often still to my demise.

All this special interest was self inflicted with that simple straight forward question to a little preschooler. It took hold with little outside influence much later. No internet then, actually no TV. TV was a rather new invention and was still off a bit. So, it's safe to say I was wired at birth to make things. Besides believing everyone is. I know this because my mom started me in my highchair. What I remember clearly to this day was being shown how to make cardboard furniture. The cardboard was salvaged from used cupcake packages. I passed this on with my first son. He joined me making art in the studio.....I contained him in his highchair with paper and water colours to keep an eye on him and away from his favorite walls. Later he did much the same as me.....only his was dungeons and dragons. He spent hours drawing his favorite thing. He was very good at it too. Sadly for him life interfered.

Little did I know, all that time devouring art/architecture history picture books while watching black & white TV...as a fresh teen (not doing my homework) would develop an eye for detail and good design.....even good art. Something that really started early in grade school. I was reminded recently how early this thing actually took root and how lucky I really was it did!

Books and magazines published then were about the best of the best...... so you could say, except for my surroundings I wasn't exposed to the norm......it was ignored in favor of what I saw (not the words)  in my special interests books..... That was my norm. How cool was that!
  
My guess, this is not an unusual story, but typical. How successful we are revolves around self-discipline and opportunity at the right times. 

Sadly for many, life gets in the way and it dies early. I often see talent holding on waiting patiently for the day they regain some control of their time. The highchair and school often raises hopes for our special interest. The opportunity of free-time to pursue self-interests is compelling to a young mother. More often than not we have grey hair and are happy to start a new game or career opportunity:=) In some cases , actually a time when many also need a reason to get up in the morning. Making art is a good reason. But it does take a self-disciplined creative mind to pull it off.

The fun of Swimming-in-Paint or SIP is seeing what happens when they rediscover their lost special interest again.

Here's the problem I see over and over again, a willingness, yes, little confidence coupled with an under developed eye. The possibilities we embrace as youngsters is no longer an open book. Unless time is made, creative energy gets devoured by life itself so it's hard to shake it out. Because they understand why, the "creative part", the challenge increases and is more difficult..... if you possess a good eye, know what you expect or want and more importantly know what you have to do to get there. It seems as an adult it would be a piece of cake to get there. As an  adult with a good eye I can tell you its not! We have to force our brain to accept what our eyes see and make our body do it! If we see dark, don't paint it light, believe what you imagine or see and do it!

Ever try to improve your hand writing? Try it! Your eye tells you, compared to others you admire, its crap!  Is it tight and tiny or does it flow with clean flowing lines? Perhaps it takes more space between two lines than allowed....a little stylize, flash and dash perhaps? Whatever way it is will be how you'll paint! Unless, you have the ability to change it. The creative part! Our first serious art lesson is learning how to write.  How well we do that follows us unless we can learn to control it!

As a coach I need to know if it ever existed in the first place or if making art is the fashionable thing to do as we get older? After all, making art is a very effective pastime/therapy tool. Why someone wants to make art has to be ferreted out. It's very obvious in a young person, they make the time, one way or the other. They easily rebel against control!

Time is limited with young families so "Night Painters" abound. Seniors are a bit different, especially if it was a childhood thing and little in between. Its easy to love and acquire art. Making art is another matter.
 
A question I no longer wonder about. Will I or do we loose our special talent/creative energy as we age.....when does it end? If we had it in the first place It ends with our last breath!

All these words need at least one picture!!



Friday, November 24, 2017

My favorite painter - babbling to an answer

I was recently asked this very question and drew a "BLANK"! No one name instantly came to mind. A flood of names did but it was more about paintings they did than the artists.  I have some favorite art works but no absolute work outside our personal collection. In other words, nothing had a lasting impact which seems odd even to me. Someone who devoured library books on anything related to Architecture, design and art as a teen and still do should. Words were less important than the pictures....otherwise visual arts would not have captured my interest. Perhaps why I can't recall past artist names easily. So, I decided to spend Thanksgiving day ferreting out what influenced me the most and could it be narrowed down.

After a full day of research, dinner and a nap and one more day - to my absolute surprise I nailed it down! Rembrandt, Monet and Rothko!

 WHERE IT STARTED



Rembrandt, because told he was the master oil painter. The only artist I really copied any of his paintings...other than a Titian self portrait as a teen. I perfected studying a painting more. Living artist David Leffel spent a lifetime romancing Rembrandt and it shows in his work. I never wanted to emulate another artist to spend a lifetime doing it. Maybe why I can't answer that question "Who's your favorite Artist?" So artist David Leffel has a special place, because he helped me qualify if my self inflicted studies were valid by starting at the beginning studying best of breed masters. I watched a few of his videos and listened to what he had to say and realized we followed a similar path and thinking...... Laughing, even with regards to Monet!  Which is why this Monet revelation surprised me. However Rothko did not. After watching a BBC documentary, he was a good match straight up...... a little quirky in a few areas too. I always liked his paintings but didn't know who the artist was until then. He had a signature look so it was easy to pick his work out. Simple classic design is hard to miss in a thumbnail lineup. It stands out! 

Van Dyke, Veneer, Turner, Sargent, Degas, french artists Fragonard and Jean-Baptiste Greuze (laughing, a more interesting one after online search today) along with Murillo and countless others had a share in my development. But not one I related to on a broad spectrum as Rembrandt, Monet and Rothko.

And not for the reason you would expect. It's not about what they painted so much as how each thought and approached their careers.

Monet brought it home. Searching for that Turkey painting of his, I was reminded how he thought and approached his art career. He would probably never have painted it other than he needed money to support his art and family. Notice I put art first, because it was. The review of the painting is what clinched it. He was expected to paint for the best rooms and if he wanted patrons, he did as others before him and after. More importantly he believed in himself, his ability and his art, enough to self-promote it and made sure his legacy was not reduced to the local dump. In his case, not being mainstream could easily happen. He was quite clever and ahead of his time in that department. As we know today, he was an original, self-taught, rejected establishment values of the time with great armature success. I have a tendency to like his work after 1882. Today his work is immensely popular.  Like great painters Rembrandt and Caravaggio, he was a direct painter, in his case acquired through plein air painting which made him fast and intuitive. A painting technique requiring little to no drawing except paint marks representing light. He also developed a clear understanding of what he was painting, partially deploying series painting at its best. I believe the first to do it quite that way. An organized, self-taught, problem solving artist who understood his lot and planned the final outcome...to a Tee! Exactly why he's my favorite of the three! 

PAINTING FOR MONEY

FROM TURKEYS TO THIS












The only other I know who did something similar was Rothko's Seagram Paintings (Now at the Tate). Two extremes - painting mood on a mammoth scale.





This last photo shows spot lighting glow added to Rothko, perhaps the glow they talk about when in its presence. Rothko knew lighting was key and kept it low deliberately - today perhaps not as important as it would be to him. He's been dead for quite awhile. Only his eye would know.....unless he set it in the first place.....perhaps at the chapel collection is or was. The Tate feels right to the BBC Power of Art series where they show him working on these canvases......rather dark. Looking at many online images - his work is much richer and brighter than expected.






Artists Rothko and Monet seem to bring it all together near the end. I'm not sure Rembrandt was as lucky because he destroyed the one work that perhaps could be called the beginning of great conclusion to ones career. The Conspiracy of Claudius Civilis seems to be the one, a rejected commission (below) lost. Rembrandt himself, desperate for money cut it up to make it easier to sell. Interesting story too. Regardless, he produced a stunning body of work.... life often gets in the way  but history gets the final word on legacy.

A CONCEPT

REDUCED TO MEDIOCRITY
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Conspiracy_of_Claudius_Civilis
click image to story

Fun research project....well worth not painting as planned. Now I can answer the question without hesitation! Also laughing, I found more than I bargained for. Another post:=)

Wednesday, November 22, 2017

Tommorw is National "TURKEY" day

And, I never painted one, but Monet did. It's such an iconic American image you would think it's a popular subject besides dinner! I remembered this painting from a film on the Impressionists. So in  honor of the day I went looking for it........it's not exactly a popular painting. I did find it and then wanted to know a bit more because I never understood exactly why he painted it! 

This little gem is not small! It's a very commanding size at  67 3/4 x 68 7/8. Not surprising it is an almost square... Titled "TURKEYS". Well, not a clever inspired title. We seem to like clever titles today, often unrelated. Perhaps to spark comments...... if you look, I'm sure there are volumes out there explaining it. 

I actually think "TURKEYS" is an appropriate title. Artists often refer to an unhappy painting as a "turkey".......guilty! Perhaps where it originated.

Claude Monet's Turkeys (67-3/4x68-7/8 inches) oil on canvas
Musee d'Orsay in Paris.

I FOUND THIS STRAIGHT UP! It answered my first impression of the painting... WHY! It was a commission and he needed money to feed his family!

Claude Monet painted Turkeys in 1876. Monet painted a flock of turkeys on the lawn of his patron Hoschede's estate in Montgeron. Planned as a decorative panel, Turkeys marked the rare introduction of animals into Monet's natural setting.

When the work was shown in the third Impressionist exhibition, the critical response was mixed. One critic urged the viewer to think of how well it would look in a lavishly furnished dining room, while others disparaged Monet's choice of subject as ridiculous.


WOW! Paintings in the day were for the best rooms and subject was important if you wanted to eat as an artist..... and size was obviously important! An artists work had to be shown and exhibited if they wanted patrons. Seems like I recall Monet referred to as a "decorative painter" in my youth. According to a google search, a top 3 Art Faux Pas, never refer to an artist as a "decorative painter". Sounds like double talk to me! Nothing has changed other than the verbal dressing!

Friday, November 17, 2017

Finding a Wall

A PERFECT FIT!


My last Koi & Lilies quickly found a warm, cozy home to hang around in. Nice if they all did... I always enjoy getting photos that show how the paintings are doing! This one is doing just fine:=)

ON A MORE SERIOUS SIDE

These photos remind me of a very common declaration artists often make. "I don't paint over the sofa paintings"! Then comes the "inspirational from the soul part". My first thought! I wonder where they do want them to hang......enshrined in a museum? Where does that come from? My guess, it's an old elitist, we don't breath the same air thing. My guess, that's still around too!

Perhaps they really mean, they don't want any commercial influence contaminating the creative process. Now that I understand....... kinda like doing commissions. Yikes!  

The odds are against a painting at the outset. We can make art all day long but in the end, it has to match up to an unknown outsider to find a home or a wall. The size, colour, subject, price and long list or other things on someones wish list have to quintessentially match up. Compromise is probably not on the table.

Besides our own heart, our art has to make someone elses heart thump! I personally call it the "jump factor". We see it happen when someone encounters something special or it happens to us and the prize proudly leaves tightly under an arm...

When I make art, I have a more practical view, actually a logical one, paintings are typically meant to hang on a wall and more often than not, as part of the decoration. Given that reality I want the best walls possible for my work. I don't think giving it consideration  contaminates the creative process in any way shape or form.

I also think how we get there is irrelevant and has no hard and fast rules......only the rules or constraints we personally place on ourselves!

What happened to my Binge?

Dingily damn! I fell off the wagon again! The cold hard facts......my energy left the room. The first part of my project binge went no where other than to use up a roll of canvas! So, time to stop, take a break and think about getting back to it!

Over the weekend, still not in the mood to paint, I picked up a 30x30 canvas during Swimming-in-Paint and entered into my auto-pilot zone. So, as my final SIP demo of the year it has a fun title, "Auto-pilot".

All kidding aside, the minute I pick up a brush it doesn't take long getting in the mood to find out where it goes....:=)

Auto-pilot 30x30 oil on linen (11-12-17 canvas 1186)
 
Auto-pilot 30x30 oil on linen (11-12-17 canvas 1186)

Last weekend was the finial Swimming-in-Paint for this year. So, we have some open holiday time after our open house on Friday night to rekindle new energy. Myself, I have another bigger stack of white canvas just itching for some attention. Not to mention "Sunshine" wanting attention too......wonder what wins?

"SUNSHINE"

Monday, November 13, 2017

September & October Coaches "WOW" awards!

September and October we had a number of outstanding paintings completed during studio.

My favorite part of coaching is seeing the team grow, producing art able to be shared and art to delight the many art lovers that frequent Crossroads bi-monthly openings...... a celebration of art and artists.
 


The Swimming-in-Paint walls are to inspire and show the team what is required to make "Best wall" paintings. Paintings meant to sell, leave, and find their own destiny. Seeing our work all dressed up and on the wall is priceless to our development as artists. When our art speaks to others, even better! This is how we find out.

GOOD PAINTINGS ALWAYS FIND WALLS TO HANG ON!

Always protect the value of your art, your galleries and those who cherish and collect your work.

COACHES SEPTEMBER & OCTOBER TEAM
"WOW AWARDS"

VICKY GROSS


and then...
Developed

BARBARA BYRD

KATHY RIVIERA

BONNIE JORDAN

E. LONGSTREET


SUSAN PAAVOLA


MIKE HAUBENSTOCK 
"Last Call"

THE "WOW PAINTINGS" will be on display in the Chuck Larivey gallery at Crossroads through December. This month is special, because we have a bi-monthly opening to celebrate on November 17th from 6:00pm to 9:00pm. 

Stop by, take a peek or better yet give one a good wall to hang around on. 

CONGRATULATIONS!!!

TO ALL THE SEPTEMBER & OCTOBER TEAMS FOR A JOB WELL DONE!

Friday, November 10, 2017

I should be painting + LED lighting

The sun is out, probably cold outside too.... but still, the sun is shining brightly into my studio. Perfect for painting with or without additional lighting. 

Which brings me to artificial light. I found some really "bright" LED bulbs on Amazon prime the other day. So, I purchased a box of (4), just under $60 by Luxrite. The specs are 16.5 watts, par 38, 100w replacement, 1160 lumen, color 5000K, bright white. I chose them thinking they were 6000K on the colour spectrum. I was curious about what kind of light I would get. My mistake, but I'm not disappointed, because these 5000K lamps work well beyond my expectation. 

Local suppliers call "Bright White" at around 3000K and is mostly available for the residential market. There are more floods than spots on the shelves...... so most of the 5000K are floods and sometimes dimmable. Best place to buy LED is online!


 

The key for good painting light is the "lumen" and "colour" ratings. The higher the better and I personally prefer spots to floods, because it keeps the light directed to surface. On a sunny day, with these LED lamps cranked up, colours are crisp and its like being outside in bright daylight.......not bad on a cloudy day either. 



These are suppose to be dimmable, but I don't see it written on the box, now that would disappoint me! Sunglasses......perhaps required on a fresh white canvas. 


Lamps a & d are older LED lamps, less "lumen" than the new Luxrite "b" lamps. 

The center fixture "c" is a very cool, specialized art light available through Jerry's.. a bit expensive at $120. However, worth every penny because its full range and controllable. Still life painters might really appreciate this the most. To my surprise up to 1700 "lumen" - I did notice it was much brighter on my canvas with the rest on.

ML-Direct Screw-In Picture Light The ML-Direct is a screw-in picture and accent light that screws in to an existing lighting fixture. The included remote control allows for the control of color temperature and beam size. 

Key Features:
  • Adjustable Lens: Beam diameter of 20" to 60“ at 6’ from artwork
  • ML200 Light Output: Up to 560 lumens (Battery) – 870 lumens (AC Adapter)
  • ML-Direct Light Output: Up to 1700 lumens
  • Lamp Life: 50,000
  • Adjustable Color Temperature: 2700K to 7000k – on remote
  • Dimmable
  • Timer: 3 hr. automatic shut off w/ 3 or 6 hr. extension – on remote
  • Remote-controlled
Perfect For:
  • The Must Have For All Art Lovers,/li>
  • Home accent lighting solutions
  • Gallery lighting
  • Allowing artwork to be appreciated in their best light
  • Bring out the true color of your art