Aside from the written word, how cool is this mans work! The downside of posting this, is it will make mine look loose and inept; regardless, here it is.
The Champion Single Sculls (Max Schmitt in a Single Scull), 1871
Thomas Eakins (American, 1844–1916)
Oil on canvas
Thomas Eakins (American, 1844–1916)
Oil on canvas
32 1/4 x 46 1/4 in. (81.9 x 117.5 cm)
Purchase, The Alfred N. Punnett Endowment Fund and George D. Pratt Gift, 1934 (34.92)
Purchase, The Alfred N. Punnett Endowment Fund and George D. Pratt Gift, 1934 (34.92)
Well said, by someone who obviously appreciates his work. For me there
is a certain attraction to how Eakins presented a subject, especially his formal, sometimes gritty but always dignified approach. The
essence comes through loud and clear......a true
realist or how I would interpret the meaning of the word "realist" regardless of how refined or abstract it's portrayed. As a youngster I only studied the images! Art classifications still leave me scratching my head in wonderment....I have a tendency to simplify it to single descriptive words or look at the pictures and move on! In truth, unless I know the artist, I'm less interested in the artist and more the results as in Eakins. However, as I've come to find out, the man was more than that!
I came across another interesting site while looking for this image of The Swimming Hole. The other painting I'm sure was in my book. I'm also sure it first got my attention because kids weren't allowed to see naked bodies....we did in art books tho:=) However, thinking about it - we did skinny dip in the summer (no girls allowed). We did swim naked in the school pool; we did, because in those days suits were not permitted. So perhaps this painting has a normal relevance for a certain age group, but not today or how it's generally interpreted, apparently by some of our learned scholars and critics. I wouldn't have associated it with sexual content until after reading this by Louis Torres , basically comments about many of Eakins works over a long period of time and more specifically defending this painting and Eakins fascination with the male nude. I don't understand the taboo of painting a male figure - it's like having salt without pepper.....it's narrow thinking and censorship, but that's our world.
One of the things I found much more fascinating than the speculative maligning of Eakins, was Eakins use of photography, photo projection, and his role in moving pictures. But, perhaps even more than that, how it negatively impacted his legacy, even today! Including this same painting below, in some learned circles viewed as "non art" because of its use. Obviously I don't agree - I for one, am not giving up my camera, Photoshop, salt and pepper or sugar and cream! Oh Yes! That also includes butter.......some of gods little pleasure are worth the price!
I came across another interesting site while looking for this image of The Swimming Hole. The other painting I'm sure was in my book. I'm also sure it first got my attention because kids weren't allowed to see naked bodies....we did in art books tho:=) However, thinking about it - we did skinny dip in the summer (no girls allowed). We did swim naked in the school pool; we did, because in those days suits were not permitted. So perhaps this painting has a normal relevance for a certain age group, but not today or how it's generally interpreted, apparently by some of our learned scholars and critics. I wouldn't have associated it with sexual content until after reading this by Louis Torres , basically comments about many of Eakins works over a long period of time and more specifically defending this painting and Eakins fascination with the male nude. I don't understand the taboo of painting a male figure - it's like having salt without pepper.....it's narrow thinking and censorship, but that's our world.
One of the things I found much more fascinating than the speculative maligning of Eakins, was Eakins use of photography, photo projection, and his role in moving pictures. But, perhaps even more than that, how it negatively impacted his legacy, even today! Including this same painting below, in some learned circles viewed as "non art" because of its use. Obviously I don't agree - I for one, am not giving up my camera, Photoshop, salt and pepper or sugar and cream! Oh Yes! That also includes butter.......some of gods little pleasure are worth the price!
The Swimming Hole - Thomas Eakins 1884-5
It's apparent to me Eakins had some lasting influence
on my original interests and early development albeit only from a few
paintings, apparently the right ones! LOL....I never got to see bad ones
or even make a judgment beyond yes or no......perhaps my own, but I
never thought they were bad....still don't! Nice thing about
adolescence, not knowing better, I just dove in! Sometimes it pays not to
read the very fine art print but simply enjoy the images....
Later......